[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[emacs-humanities] Why Emacs-humanities?
From: |
Paul W. Rankin |
Subject: |
[emacs-humanities] Why Emacs-humanities? |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Dec 2020 20:32:07 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Purely Mail via Roundcube/1.4.7 |
Why Emacs-humanities?
A few people have raised this question so as the person who put forth
the proposal, the blame likely lies with me. And so, I'll attempt to
articulate the motivation...
I've long suspected there to be a modest number of people who use Emacs
for things wholly unrelated to programming, and that for such people
their interest in programming might (currently) be little to zero. It's
understandable that people without an interest in programming are
unlikely to participate in the preexisting GNU lists associated with
Emacs, which mostly take a programming focus.
It also seemed that many if not most of this group operated in or around
the Humanities, or Liberal Arts (although being firmly rooted in the
domain myself, I plausibly suffer from confirmation bias), e.g. people
using Emacs to write their PhDs, research projects, novels, screenplays,
etc.
EmacsConf 2020 [1] appeared to confirm this, both in its selection of
topics, and the concurrent discussions on IRC/Matrix. The recent Emacs
Survey [2] also showed that more than two-thirds the number of
respondents who use Emacs for software development use it for writing,
or if you add "research writing", the tallies between software and
writing are almost equal. Over 600 respondents said they did not use
Emacs for software development at all.
I'd posit there are still more people who otherwise work with text and
are stifled by their mainstream non-free tools, but feel that the free
software alternatives are intended only for programmers.
What I thought was needed was for GNU to send a strong signal that the
doors are open to people using free software, i.e. Emacs, even if
they're not currently interesting in programming, and for this
invitation to be specific, i.e. Emacs within the Humanities, rather than
vague.
I'd also like to single out a couple of people working in this
Emacs-Humanities space...
Co-moderator Protesilaos Stavrou [3] is the author of the wonderful
Modus Emacs themes, which are designed to conform with accessibility
standards, while he also publishes essays and books on various -isms
("On nihilism, scepticism, absolutism" has caught my eye.)
Leo Vivier (zaeph) [4], is an English teacher in France working in
Literature and Media/Visual Studies, who was one of the
organisers/presenters for EmacsConf 2020 and is a maintainer of (among
others) Org-Roam. Leo is currently facilitating the Emacs Research
Group, which is investigating ways in which Emacs is or can be used in
academic and government research.
For those interested in where my own work overlaps with Emacs:
Fountain Mode - A major mode for screenwriting in Fountain plain-text
markup
https://git.skeletons.cc/fountain-mode/about/
Binder - A global minor mode facilitating multi-file writing projects
https://git.skeletons.cc/binder/about/
Olivetti - A minor mode to automatically balance window margins
https://git.skeletons.cc/olivetti/about/
Finally, let me say that I have no real plan for the direction of
discussions on this list, nor do I want to be viewed as anything more
than the random guy who suggested it. I hope that topics of discussion
grow organically. I'm sure that subscribers will be interested in
hearing about your projects using Emacs in the Humanities, your
approaches to certain problems, questions, ideas, recent discoveries,
etc.
[1] https://emacsconf.org/2020/
[2] https://emacssurvey.org/2020/
[3] https://protesilaos.com/
[4] https://zaeph.net
--
PWR
The single best thing you can do for the world is delete your social
media accounts.
- [emacs-humanities] Why Emacs-humanities?,
Paul W. Rankin <=
Re: [emacs-humanities] Why Emacs-humanities?, Garjola Dindi, 2020/12/21
Re: [emacs-humanities] Why Emacs-humanities?, Stefan Kangas, 2020/12/21