Re: [O] GFDL

[Sebastien Vauban]

Hi Bastien,

Bastien wrote:
> Ben Finney <address@hidden> writes:
>>> It bothers me mostly for the guide, where I did spend a lot of time to
>>> make it compact, and now something like one fifth of it is license
>>> text.  We may actually consider to re-release the guide under a
>>> different license.
>>
>> Please use this as an opportunity to seriously consider relicensing the
>> entire work (programs, documentation, etc.) of Org-mode under the same
>> license: the GNU GPL. It does not have the special problems of the FDL,
>> and having the whole work under the same license terms makes it simpler
>> and clearer.
>
> Well, relicensing the Org compact guide under GNU GPL is definitely
> feasible, but relicensing the Org manual is (sadly) not.  Let's take
> the feasible step first?

FMI, why is GNU GPL not applicable to the manual?

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban