[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] GFDL
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [O] GFDL |
Date: |
Wed, 22 May 2013 06:43:56 +0200 |
On 21.5.2013, at 17:03, François Pinard <address@hidden> wrote:
> Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I am curious, what passage does make such restrictions possible, and
>> which kinds of restrictions?
>
> Oh, I did not read the GFDL in quite a years, and really have no
> interest in diving and scrutinizing it again :-).
OK, I will not ask again. :)
> More away I am from
> all this, better I feel :-). Sorry, just forget I've written this
> morning, I was likely in some strange mood.
>
> I do love the FSF idea and theory, and supported the GNU project in an
> intense way for maybe more than twenty years. But by now, in practice,
> I just cannot stand their slightest abuse, anymore. I'm all for
> programming freedom, but this ought to include programmer freedom too!
>
> François
>
- Re: [O] GFDL, Ben Finney, 2013/05/20
- Re: [O] GFDL, Bastien, 2013/05/21
- Re: [O] GFDL, Sebastien Vauban, 2013/05/21
- Re: [O] GFDL, François Pinard, 2013/05/21
- Re: [O] GFDL, Carsten Dominik, 2013/05/21
- Re: [O] GFDL, François Pinard, 2013/05/21
- Re: [O] GFDL,
Carsten Dominik <=
- Re: [O] GFDL, Bastien, 2013/05/21
- Re: [O] GFDL, Ben Finney, 2013/05/25
- Re: [O] GFDL, Bastien, 2013/05/27
- [O] [OT] Contributors to org.texi (was: GFDL), Memnon Anon, 2013/05/21