[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex
From: |
Eduardo Mercovich |
Subject: |
Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:43:34 -0300 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.15; emacs 24.5.1 |
Aloha Thomas.
Sorry the late reply.
[...]
>> + what is the difference between using the :ignore: tag and add
>> "COMMENT" as the first characters in the line (the native Org mechanism
>> to prevent export)? I tried them and didn't saw the difference.
> With the :ignore: tag the headline is ignored, but the text below it is
> exported. This is useful for situations like the front matter of a
> book, which is mostly assembled by LaTeX. The :ignore: tag allows you
> to isolate the various LaTeX commands in your document so they are
> separate from the headings with text that you'll write, but still
> contribute to the export.
Ah, got it. Useful indeed, thanks. :)
>> + if I put a plain text link in a sidenote (like
>> "\sidenote{see http://AgileManifesto.org}";), it doesn't get
>> automagically converted to a link as it is in the text body. It appears
>> as normal text and without the \url{...}, so it doesn't look and doesn't
>> act as a link.
> IIUC, I think you need to tell Org mode that this is a link:
> \sidenote{see [[http://AgileManifesto.org]]}.
I tried it and still I have some issues...
I have Org-mode version 8.3.1 (8.3.1-95-g1dbb25-elpaplus) and GNU Emacs
24.5.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.24.10).
Using the same org document as source, if I use the standard latex
export everything seems fine (except this sidenote link that does not
get hiperlinked as URL), but if I use tufte-latex (with "require
'ox-tufte-latex" in my .emacs file) I have a "PDF file produced with
errors" message. However, I can't spot the difference between both files
with my eyes (they have the same size, but diff says they are
different).
In both cases -orglatex and tuftelatex- the sidenote linke gets rendered
with the double brackets around and not as clickable URL.
How can I give you more info to diagnose this case?
>> + using links as specific Latex markup seems a great idea. However, the
>> links face definition makes it specially visible, and impossible to
>> separate from any other URL since the properties are hidden. Can that be
>> tweaked (maybe not it your class, of course, but in the .emacs file or
>> similar), so as to keep the writing flow unperturbed?
>
> I agree that it would be useful to make the appearance of links in the
> Org mode buffer configurable on a per-link basis. Different colors for
> different kinds of link might go some way to resolving the visual
> ambiguities you describe. However, I don't think this is currently
> possible.
Pity, but completely understandable.
Is it possible to do that in org for latex fragments (like putting
f"\sidenote{" and the closing "}" in a lighter face)?
Sorry if this is obvious but I'm relatively new to the Emacs-verse.
> [...] In practice, I mouse over the link to see the link type in the
> minibuffer.
Great tip!
Again, thank you org-tufte-latex. I can be a heavy user of this system,
so I hope to be of help to make it even better. :)
Best...
--
eduardo mercovich
Donde se cruzan tus talentos
con las necesidades del mundo,
ahí está tu vocación.
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, (continued)
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Rasmus, 2016/02/03
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/02/03
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Rasmus, 2016/02/03
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/02/03
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Thomas S . Dye, 2016/02/03
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Thomas S . Dye, 2016/02/03
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Rasmus, 2016/02/03
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Thomas S . Dye, 2016/02/03
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, Eduardo Mercovich, 2016/02/12
- Re: [O] ox-tufte-latex, John Hendy, 2016/02/22