[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates
From: |
Rasmus |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]") |
Date: |
Mon, 21 May 2018 16:19:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Emacs Gnus |
Hi,
Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
>>> One remaining decision to make is: what is the future of org-tempo? I am
>>> sympathetic to the idea that the best place for it eventually would be
>>> org-contrib or GNU ELPA, and not org core.
>>
>> We don’t have make that decision now, do we?
>
> No. For now I'd like to get back to your original "trigger" and
> continue to enhance the org-tempo code so that it allows to wrap
> regions around templates.
How would that work? A snippet is at the beginning of the line? Also, if
I have delete-selection-mode on it might not make sense to try and "save"
region when expanding a tempo snippet.
Rasmus
--
Evidence suggests Snowden used a powerful tool called monospaced fonts
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), (continued)
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Eric S Fraga, 2018/05/01
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Rasmus Pank Roulund, 2018/05/02
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Aaron Ecay, 2018/05/02
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Rasmus, 2018/05/05
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Aaron Ecay, 2018/05/06
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Rasmus, 2018/05/07
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Aaron Ecay, 2018/05/07
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Bastien, 2018/05/08
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Rasmus, 2018/05/21
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Bastien, 2018/05/08
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"),
Rasmus <=
- [O] Smooth transition for modules (was: [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]")), Bastien, 2018/05/08
- Re: [O] Smooth transition for modules (was: [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]")), Aaron Ecay, 2018/05/08
- Re: [O] Smooth transition for modules, Bastien, 2018/05/08
- Re: [O] Smooth transition for modules, Aaron Ecay, 2018/05/08
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Bastien, 2018/05/08
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Rasmus, 2018/05/02
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Bernt Hansen, 2018/05/02
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Bernt Hansen, 2018/05/02