[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates
From: |
Rasmus |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]") |
Date: |
Sat, 05 May 2018 19:29:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Emacs Gnus |
Aaron Ecay <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Rasmus,
>
> 2018ko maiatzak 2an, Rasmus Pank Roulund-ek idatzi zuen:
>>> Finally, irrespective of which options are chosen, I think that org-tempo
>>> would be better implemented in terms of a minor mode. This would allow
>>> it to be autoloaded, turned on/off for different buffer(s) in an emacs
>>> session, and avoid duplicating the logic for activating global minor
>>> modes. Patch attached.
>>
>> I agree.
>
> OK, thatʼs good to know. Iʼve held off on any pushing of the patch to
> master until everything is worked out. In the meantime, Iʼve put it in
> a branch “org-tempo”.
>
> I also added a second commit to that branch which implements my vision
> of the upgrade path (deprecation warnings, etc.) For convenience, that
> patch is also attached to this email.
I don’t like it, I’m afraid. It’s a bit nagging. There’s tools to mark
thinks as obsolete in Emacs should we need to.
> One remaining decision to make is: what is the future of org-tempo? I am
> sympathetic to the idea that the best place for it eventually would be
> org-contrib or GNU ELPA, and not org core.
We don’t have make that decision now, do we?
Rasmus
--
This message is brought to you by the department of redundant departments
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), (continued)
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Adrian Bradd, 2018/05/05
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Bastien, 2018/05/08
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Christophe Schockaert, 2018/05/01
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Aaron Ecay, 2018/05/01
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Eric S Fraga, 2018/05/01
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Rasmus Pank Roulund, 2018/05/02
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Aaron Ecay, 2018/05/02
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"),
Rasmus <=
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Aaron Ecay, 2018/05/06
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Rasmus, 2018/05/07
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Aaron Ecay, 2018/05/07
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Bastien, 2018/05/08
- Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Rasmus, 2018/05/21
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Bastien, 2018/05/08
Re: [O] [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]"), Rasmus, 2018/05/21
[O] Smooth transition for modules (was: [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]")), Bastien, 2018/05/08
Re: [O] Smooth transition for modules (was: [POLL] Should Org tempo be enabled by default? (expand templates thru e.g. "<s[TAB]")), Aaron Ecay, 2018/05/08
Re: [O] Smooth transition for modules, Bastien, 2018/05/08