[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [BUG] "\fC" macro in ox-man.el [9.6.15 (release_9.6.15 @ /usr/share/
From: |
onf |
Subject: |
Re: [BUG] "\fC" macro in ox-man.el [9.6.15 (release_9.6.15 @ /usr/share/emacs/29.2/lisp/org/)] |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Jan 2025 17:38:52 +0100 |
On Sun Jan 19, 2025 at 3:04 PM CET, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> "onf" <onf@disroot.org> writes:
> >> I am wondering if the situations like the above should be caught by
> >> groff linter. Currently, they seem not.
> >
> > They actually are:
> > ...
> > troff:<standard input>:2: warning: cannot select font 'C'
> > One two three four.
>
> Sorry, I was not clear.
> What I meant is
>
> \fBbold \fIitalic\fP\fP
Hm. The behavior of \fP\fP is actually intended and can be used
non-pathologically:
One \fBtwo\fP three \fPfour\fP five \fPsix\fP seven.
...but it's rarely used because it's not very readable. I guess this
makes it fall into the same category as interpolating undefined
registers as 0, which some code also relies on, but is often not
intended, hence it having an optional warning category 'reg'.
~ onf
Re: [BUG] "\fC" macro in ox-man.el [9.6.15 (release_9.6.15 @ /usr/share/emacs/29.2/lisp/org/)], G. Branden Robinson, 2025/01/02
Re: [BUG] "\fC" macro in ox-man.el [9.6.15 (release_9.6.15 @ /usr/share/emacs/29.2/lisp/org/)], G. Branden Robinson, 2025/01/02