[ff-cvs] libvob/doc/pegboard/animation_api--mudyc peg.rst

[Matti Katila]

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/libvob
Module name:    libvob
Branch:         
Changes by:     Matti Katila <address@hidden>   03/10/24 02:28:34

Modified files:
        doc/pegboard/animation_api--mudyc: peg.rst 

Log message:
        less

CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/libvob/libvob/doc/pegboard/animation_api--mudyc/peg.rst.diff?tr1=1.8&tr2=1.9&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: libvob/doc/pegboard/animation_api--mudyc/peg.rst
diff -u libvob/doc/pegboard/animation_api--mudyc/peg.rst:1.8 
libvob/doc/pegboard/animation_api--mudyc/peg.rst:1.9
--- libvob/doc/pegboard/animation_api--mudyc/peg.rst:1.8        Thu Oct 23 
16:15:54 2003
+++ libvob/doc/pegboard/animation_api--mudyc/peg.rst    Fri Oct 24 02:28:34 2003
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
 
 :Authors:  mudyc
 :Date-Created: 2003-09-27
-:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/10/23 20:15:54 $
-:Revision: $Revision: 1.8 $
+:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/10/24 06:28:34 $
+:Revision: $Revision: 1.9 $
 :Status:   Current
 :Stakeholders: mudyc, tjl, benja
 :Scope:    Minor
@@ -46,13 +46,8 @@
 ISSUE: If we don't want people to see AbstractUpdateManager
 should we hide some of it's methods to package private?
 
-    Small demos might still need these methods.
-    Otoh, safer is better. One possibility is to 
-    add this API within the demo framework but then it would be
-    very hard to call from the java side.
-
-    RESOLVED: Issue can be solved in future because this PEG
-    still gives a plenty of room for handling it. 
+    RESOLVED: Issue can be solved later because this PEG
+    still gives a plenty of room for handling it in future. 
     Implementing the interfaace in demo framework also makes 
     it much more easier to use than old way and increments readability
     of source.