[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ff-cvs] libvob/doc/pegboard/animation_api--mudyc peg.rst

From: Matti Katila
Subject: [ff-cvs] libvob/doc/pegboard/animation_api--mudyc peg.rst
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 02:28:34 -0400

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/libvob
Module name:    libvob
Changes by:     Matti Katila <address@hidden>   03/10/24 02:28:34

Modified files:
        doc/pegboard/animation_api--mudyc: peg.rst 

Log message:


Index: libvob/doc/pegboard/animation_api--mudyc/peg.rst
diff -u libvob/doc/pegboard/animation_api--mudyc/peg.rst:1.8 
--- libvob/doc/pegboard/animation_api--mudyc/peg.rst:1.8        Thu Oct 23 
16:15:54 2003
+++ libvob/doc/pegboard/animation_api--mudyc/peg.rst    Fri Oct 24 02:28:34 2003
@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@
 :Authors:  mudyc
 :Date-Created: 2003-09-27
-:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/10/23 20:15:54 $
-:Revision: $Revision: 1.8 $
+:Last-Modified: $Date: 2003/10/24 06:28:34 $
+:Revision: $Revision: 1.9 $
 :Status:   Current
 :Stakeholders: mudyc, tjl, benja
 :Scope:    Minor
@@ -46,13 +46,8 @@
 ISSUE: If we don't want people to see AbstractUpdateManager
 should we hide some of it's methods to package private?
-    Small demos might still need these methods.
-    Otoh, safer is better. One possibility is to 
-    add this API within the demo framework but then it would be
-    very hard to call from the java side.
-    RESOLVED: Issue can be solved in future because this PEG
-    still gives a plenty of room for handling it. 
+    RESOLVED: Issue can be solved later because this PEG
+    still gives a plenty of room for handling it in future. 
     Implementing the interfaace in demo framework also makes 
     it much more easier to use than old way and increments readability
     of source.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]