freeipmi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi support with HP iLO2 servers initial success!


From: Al Chu
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi support with HP iLO2 servers initial success!
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:59:18 -0700

Hi Chris,

On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 20:12 -0700, Christopher Maestas wrote:
> I guess another question I would ask, is when will ipmi 1.5 be
> deprecated and the default be 2.0?  I was just curious when defaults
> should move away.

The short answer is not anytime soon.  The IPMI 2.0 spec states all IPMI
2.0 systems shall support IPMI 1.5.  Given a number of older systems
support IPMI 1.5 but not IPMI 2.0, it makes sense to keep the default
IPMI 1.5.

I believe ipmitool and ipmiutil have this policy as well.

Al

> 
> This server is a proliant dl385g5 server (amd barcelona quad core).  I
> have also tested on a bl460g6 (proliant blade Intel 6 core).
> 
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Albert Chu <address@hidden> wrote:
>         Hey Chris,
>         
>         (Moving this to freeipmi-devel, since this is more of a devel
>         discussion)
>         
>         > I'm sorry I should have tagged that first case of using
>         ipmipower as
>         > an error.
>         
>         
>         Does HP believe this to be a bug in their firmware?  Many of
>         the tests
>         in the freeipmi-testing document use IPMI 1.5 specifically
>         (instead of
>         IPMI 2.0), so we'll want to get this bug fixed so you can pass
>         those
>         tests too.
>         
>         Also, as an FYI, what motherboard are you testing on?  So that
>         I can
>         document this stuff.
>         
>         Al
>         
>         
>         On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 19:38 -0700, Christopher Maestas wrote:
>         > Al,
>         >
>         >
>         > I'm sorry I should have tagged that first case of using
>         ipmipower as
>         > an error.  Once I added "-D LAN_2_0 " things worked great.
>          I think I
>         > also figured out the freeipmi.conf parameter (driver-type
>         LAN_2_0) to
>         > change to make it work by default and still talk to lo100
>         and iLO
>         > devices without any issue at first glance
>         >
>         >
>         > Things are running fine now.  I will continue to do some
>         more testing
>         > tomorrow with SOL, sensor gatherings.  In addition I will
>         try and
>         > report back on conman/powerman using their ipmi drivers work
>         against
>         > the iLO server as well.
>         >
>         >
>         > Finally I will try and take a look at some tests specified
>         here:
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         http://**www.**gnu.org/software/freeipmi/freeipmi-testing.txt
>         >
>         >
>         > and report back.
>         >
>         > -cdm
>         >
>         >
>         > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Albert Chu <address@hidden>
>         wrote:
>         >         Hi Chris,
>         >
>         >         > For freeipmi (ipmipower) I found the following
>         combination
>         >         worked:
>         >         > ---
>         >         > # ipmipower -h cut0iogw1-ilo -s
>         >         > cut0iogw1-ilo: authentication type unavailable for
>         attempted
>         >         privilege level
>         >
>         >
>         >         This isn't good.  It suggests that the HP firmware
>         might be
>         >         returning
>         >         bad/poor information in the Get Authentication
>         Capabilities
>         >         phase of
>         >         IPMI.  Does ipmipower work if you also specify the
>         authcap
>         >         workaround?
>         >         (-W authcap).
>         >
>         >         If it does work, then there is a bug.  Perhaps you
>         can send me
>         >         a --debug
>         >         output and we can take a look to figure out what the
>         bug is.
>         >
>         >         Al
>         >
>         >
>         >         On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 15:29 -0700, Christopher
>         Maestas wrote:
>         >         > Hello,
>         >         >
>         >         > With the recent update of the 2.00 iLO2 firmware,
>         we can now
>         >         support:
>         >         >
>         >         >
>         >         >    - "IPMI over LAN" functionality. The IPMI 2.0
>         RMCP+ (or
>         >         Linux ipmitool
>         >         >    "lanplus") protocol is supported with this
>         release.
>         >         >    - IPMI Serial Over LAN (SOL)
>         >         >    - Data Center Manageability Interface (DCMI)
>         v1.0
>         >         specification
>         >         >    - Enhanced the "in band" Intelligent Platform
>         Management
>         >         Interface (IPMI)
>         >         >    to comply with the IPMI specification version
>         2.0
>         >         >
>         >         > I've been able to use ipmitool to test this
>         successfully
>         >         (power, SOL and
>         >         > sensor gathering).  Here's what I do with
>         ipmitool:
>         >         > ---
>         >         > # rpm -q ipmitool
>         >         > ipmitool-1.8.11-1
>         >         > # ipmitool -I lanplus -H cut0iogw1-ilo -U USER -P
>         PASS power
>         >         status
>         >         > Chassis Power is off
>         >         > # ipmitool -I lanplus -H cut0iogw1-ilo -U USER -P
>         PASS power
>         >         on
>         >         > Chassis Power Control: Up/On
>         >         > # ipmitool -I lanplus -H cut0iogw1-ilo -U USER -P
>         PASS power
>         >         status
>         >         > Chassis Power is on
>         >         > ---
>         >         >
>         >         > For freeipmi (ipmipower) I found the following
>         combination
>         >         worked:
>         >         > ---
>         >         > # ipmipower -h cut0iogw1-ilo -s
>         >         > cut0iogw1-ilo: authentication type unavailable for
>         attempted
>         >         privilege level
>         >         > # ipmipower -h cut0iogw1-ilo -D LAN_2_0 -s
>         >         > cut0iogw1-ilo: on
>         >         > # ipmipower -h cut0iogw1-ilo -D LAN_2_0 -f
>         >         > cut0iogw1-ilo: ok
>         >         > # ipmipower -h cut0iogw1-ilo -D LAN_2_0 -s
>         >         > cut0iogw1-ilo: off
>         >         > # ipmipower -h cut0iogw1-ilo -D LAN_2_0 -n
>         >         > cut0iogw1-ilo: ok
>         >         > # ipmipower -h cut0iogw1-ilo -D LAN_2_0 -s
>         >         > cut0iogw1-ilo: on
>         >         > ---
>         >         >
>         >         > I set the following in /etc/freeipmi.conf:
>         >         > ---
>         >         > driver-type LAN_2_0
>         >         > ---
>         >         >
>         >         > and it seems to work ok for the lo100 and ilo2
>         servers just
>         >         fine.
>         >         > ---
>         >         > # ipmipower -h cut0iogw1-ilo  -s
>         >         > cut0iogw1-ilo: on
>         >         > # ipmipower -h cut0admin1-lo  -s
>         >         > cut0admin1-lo: on
>         >         > ---
>         >         >
>         >         > I figure there may be other functional tests for
>         ipmi
>         >         compliance I can run
>         >         > now that the initial flags have been worked around
>         for
>         >         freeipmi's ipmipower
>         >         > command.  Then I figure on changing
>         powerman/conman to use
>         >         ipmi drivers for
>         >         > ilo devices and see how that works.
>         >         >
>         >         > Thanks,
>         >         > -cdm
>         >
>         >         > _______________________________________________
>         >         > Freeipmi-users mailing list
>         >         > address@hidden
>         >         >
>         http://***lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-users
>         >         >
>         >         --
>         >         Albert Chu
>         >         address@hidden
>         >         Computer Scientist
>         >         High Performance Systems Division
>         >         Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         
>         --
>         
>         Albert Chu
>         address@hidden
>         Computer Scientist
>         High Performance Systems Division
>         Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
>         
>         
> 
> 
-- 
Albert Chu
address@hidden
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]