freeipmi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ganglia_ipmimonitoring.pl


From: Christopher Maestas
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ganglia_ipmimonitoring.pl
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 16:31:18 -0700

FYI:

I seem to see this when running this script now:

---
NODENAME: ipmi_sdr_cache_create: SDR record length invalid
...

Here's how I'm running it:

/path/to/ganglia_ipmi_sensors.pl -h mp-N[1-2],mp-C[1-120] -r mp-

I know I've seen this problem before, but the solution escapes me.

Thanks,
-cdm

On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Albert Chu <address@hidden> wrote:
Hey Chris, Yaroslav,

Ok.  I'll go ahead and commit this under the assumption we want to go
with it.

Al

On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 07:33 -0800, Christopher Maestas wrote:
> Sounds good ... I did some initial porting work to the 1.0 beta2 and I
> agree with you about passing any string _expression_ to be
> evaluated. :)  I'l try this out next week.
>
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>
>         On Fri, 04 Feb 2011, Albert Chu wrote:
>         > Yaroslav, will it suit your needs too?
>
>         > Both patch & script are attached.
>
>
>         thanks!  looks like it should be what was requested... I am
>         still using
>         ancient (from last year) pre-1.0 version (0.8.10), so have
>         incompatible
>         ipmi-sensors:
>
>         /usr/sbin/ipmi-sensors: unrecognized option
>         '--output-sensor-state'
>
>         but otherwise the patch looks like it should work ;)
>
>         --
>         Yaroslav O. Halchenko
>         Postdoctoral Fellow,   Department of Psychological and Brain
>         Sciences
>         Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover,
>         NH 03755
>         Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603)
>         646-1419
>         WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
>
--
Albert Chu
address@hidden
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]