freeipmi-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Freeipmi-users] ipmi-sensors: password verification timeout


From: Albert Chu
Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-users] ipmi-sensors: password verification timeout
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 16:31:17 -0800

The fact IPMI 2.0 (i.e. lanplus) works but not IPMI 1.5 works is
curious.  Is the output from:

bmc-config --checkout -vv

identical on both .23 and .24? 

Have you tried "-D lan_2_0" with ipmi-sensors to try and force ipmi 2.0
on .24?

Al

On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 16:16 -0800, Yulok Lam wrote:
> Hi Albert,
> 
>   No, it does not.  However, on a different system .23, it works. I
> have double check the password on both systems and they are good.
> See results for the .23 and .24 systems.     
> 
> address@hidden ~]# /usr/sbin/ipmi-sensors -h 192.168.160.24 -u XXXXX -p
> XXXXX -l user
> 
> /usr/sbin/ipmi-sensors: password verification timeout
> 
> address@hidden ~]# 
> 
> ===========================
> 
> address@hidden ~]# /usr/sbin/ipmi-sensors -h 192.168.160.23 -u XXXXX -p
> XXXXX -l user
> 
> ID   | Name            | Type              | Reading    | Units |
> Event
> 
> 4    | CPU1 Temp       | Temperature       | 28.00      | C     | 'OK'
> 
> 71   | CPU2 Temp       | Temperature       | 27.00      | C     | 'OK'
> 
> 138  | System Temp     | Temperature       | 29.00      | C     | 'OK'
> 
> =================================================
> 
> 
>    I have one system where I need to use the "-I lanplus" option while
> the other, I did not.  Both systems are Supermicro X9DRW-7TPF+ and
> running the same ipmitool 2.0/firmware 3.31. 
> 
> 
> address@hidden ]# ipmitool -H 192.168.160.24 -U xxxxx -P xxxxx power status
> Activate Session error: Invalid data field in request
> Error: Unable to establish LAN session
> Unable to get Chassis Power Status
> 
> 
> address@hidden ]# ipmitool -I lan -H 192.168.160.24 -U xxxx -P xxxxx power
> status
> Activate Session error: Invalid data field in request
> Error: Unable to establish LAN session
> Unable to get Chassis Power Status
> 
> 
> address@hidden ]# ipmitool -I lanplus -H 192.168.160.24 -U xxxxx -P xxxxx
> power status
> Chassis Power is on
> address@hidden
> 
> 
> ===============
> address@hidden ~]# ipmitool mc info
> Device ID                 : 32
> Device Revision           : 1
> Firmware Revision         : 3.31
> IPMI Version              : 2.0
> Manufacturer ID           : 10876
> Manufacturer Name         : Supermicro
> Product ID                : 1824 (0x0720)
> Product Name              : Unknown (0x720)
> Device Available          : yes
> Provides Device SDRs      : no
> Additional Device Support :
>     Sensor Device
>     SDR Repository Device
>     SEL Device
>     FRU Inventory Device
>     IPMB Event Receiver
>     IPMB Event Generator
>     Chassis Device
> address@hidden ~]#
> 
> 
> =================
> 
> 
> Success "without -I lanplus" on the .23 (different) server.  
> 
> 
> address@hidden ]# ipmitool -H 192.168.160.23 -U xxxxx -P xxx power status
> Chassis Power is on
> address@hidden ]#
> 
> 
>   I am thinking there must be an option in ipmitool option that I am
> forgetting. 
> 
> -Yulok Lam
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Albert Chu <address@hidden> wrote:
>         Usually this means that the password you have doesn't work.
>         When you
>         do:
>         
>         /usr/sbin/ipmi-sensors -h 192.168.160.24 -u xxxxx -p xxxxx -l
>         user
>          --quiet-cache --sdr-cache-recreate --interpret-oem-data
>          --output-sensor-state --ignore-not-available-sensors
>         
>         On the command line, does it work?  Or even something more
>         basic like:
>         
>         /usr/sbin/ipmi-sensors -h 192.168.160.24 -u xxxxx -p xxxxx
>         
>         Al
>         
>         On Mon, 2017-01-23 at 15:40 -0800, Yulok Lam wrote:
>         > Hi all,
>         >
>         >    I am getting an error "password verification timeout"
>         using
>         > check_ipmi_sensor 3.2 a Nagios plugin check on a Supermicro
>         Server
>         > X9DRW-7TPF+ system.  I have look through the documentation
>         via
>         >
>         
> http://www.gnu.org/software/freeipmi/manpages/man8/ipmi-sensors-config.8.html#lbAO
>         > concerning "password verification timeout" but doesn't have
>         a direct
>         > solution.  Any help would be greatly appreciated!
>         >
>         >
>         > address@hidden
>         ~]# /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_ipmi_sensor -H
>         > 192.168.160.24 -U xxxxx -P xxxxx  -L user -vvv
>         > ------------- begin of debug output (-vvv is set):
>         ------------
>         >   script was executed with the following parameters:
>         >     /usr/lib64/nagios/plugins/check_ipmi_sensor -H
>         192.168.160.24 -U xxxxx
>         > -P xxxxx -L user -vvv
>         >   check_ipmi_sensor version:
>         >     3.2
>         >   FreeIPMI version:
>         >     ipmi-sensors - 1.2.9
>         >   FreeIPMI was executed with the following parameters:
>         >     /usr/sbin/ipmi-sensors -h 192.168.160.24 -u xxxxx -p
>         xxxxx -l user
>         > --quiet-cache --sdr-cache-recreate --interpret-oem-data
>         > --output-sensor-state --ignore-not-available-sensors
>         >   FreeIPMI return code: 1
>         >   output of FreeIPMI:
>         > /usr/sbin/ipmi-sensors: password verification timeout
>         >
>         >   output of FRU data:
>         > --------------------- end of debug output
>         ---------------------
>         > /usr/sbin/ipmi-sensors: password verification timeout
>         >
>         > -> Execution of /usr/sbin/ipmi-sensors failed with return
>         code 1.
>         > -> /usr/sbin/ipmi-sensors was executed with the following
>         parameters:
>         >    /usr/sbin/ipmi-sensors -h 192.168.160.24 -u xxxxx -p
>         xxxxx -l user
>         > --quiet-cache --sdr-cache-recreate --interpret-oem-data
>         > --output-sensor-state --ignore-not-available-sensors
>         > address@hidden ~]#
>         >
>         > Thanks,
>         
>         --
>         Albert Chu
>         address@hidden
>         Computer Scientist
>         High Performance Systems Division
>         Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
>         
>         
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>  Yu Lok

-- 
Albert Chu
address@hidden
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]