[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc
From: |
Rich Kilmer |
Subject: |
RE: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 19:13:27 -0500 |
actually...now that I still haven't slept ;) let's resolve this subelement
of <dependency>
Horacio's proposal is <check/>
<dependency state="LOADED" action="start">
<check plugin="WiggyPlugin" version="*" state="RUNNING/>
</dependency>
what about a <when/> or <if/> tag?
<dependency state="LOADED" action="start">
<when plugin="WiggyPlugin" version="*" state="RUNNING/>
...or...
<if plugin="WiggyPlugin" version="*" state="RUNNING/>
</dependency>
thoughts?
-rich
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of Rich
> Kilmer
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 6:18 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: RE: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc
>
>
> I like <check>
>
> Any arguments?
>
> Its 6:17am here and I have not slept either ;-)
>
> -rich
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: address@hidden
> > [mailto:address@hidden Behalf Of
> > Horacio Lopez
> > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:46 AM
> > To: address@hidden
> > Subject: Re: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rich Kilmer" <address@hidden>
> > To: <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:39 AM
> > Subject: RE: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc
> > [some snipping]
> >
> > > > Just wondering about XML compliance, and possible future
> > > > syntax checks in configuration files.
> > > >
> > > > cheers,
> > > > vruz
> > >
> > > yeah, you are right. what do you think of me changing it to:
> > >
> > > <dependency ...>
> > > <dependson name="Test2_Plugin" version="*" state="RUNNING"/>
> > > </dependency>
> > >
> > > dependson? (it reads kind of weird)
> > >
> > > requires? (not to be confused with Ruby require?)
> > >
> > > what else?
> > >
> > > -Rich
> >
> > In fact, they are dependency checks, so each element
> > of <dependency> could be a <check>
> >
> > <dependency>
> > <check name="Test2_Plugin" version="*" state="RUNNING"/>
> > </dependency>
> >
> > Maybe someone else has a better idea, it's 7:44 am here and
> > I still haven't gotten any sleep :-)
> >
> > cheers,
> > vruz
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freeride-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/freeride-devel
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeride-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.freesoftware.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/freeride-devel
- [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc, Rich Kilmer, 2002/01/31
- Re: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc, Laurent Julliard, 2002/01/31
- Re: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc, Horacio Lopez, 2002/01/31
- RE: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc, Rich Kilmer, 2002/01/31
- Re: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc, Horacio Lopez, 2002/01/31
- RE: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc, Rich Kilmer, 2002/01/31
- Re: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc, Horacio Lopez, 2002/01/31
- RE: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc, Curt Hibbs, 2002/01/31
- RE: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc,
Rich Kilmer <=
- RE: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc, Curt Hibbs, 2002/01/31
- RE: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc, Rich Kilmer, 2002/01/31
- Re: [FR-devel] Updated code for the core, plugins, etc, Laurent Julliard, 2002/01/31