freetype-devel
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
[ft-devel] Why is FT_Fixed a long instead of FT_Int32?
From
:
David Saltzman
Subject
:
[ft-devel] Why is FT_Fixed a long instead of FT_Int32?
Date
:
Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:43:42 -0700
Noticed a discrepancy that when compiling on a 32 bit system, FT_Fixed is 32 bit; but on a 64 bit system, FT_Fixed is 64 bit.
FT_Fixed is supposed to be a 16.16 number, so why doesn't it use `FT_Int32` instead of `signed long`?
Thanks,
David
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread
]
[ft-devel] Why is FT_Fixed a long instead of FT_Int32?
,
David Saltzman
<=
Re: [ft-devel] Why is FT_Fixed a long instead of FT_Int32?
,
Alexei Podtelezhnikov
,
2019/08/26
Re: [ft-devel] Why is FT_Fixed a long instead of FT_Int32?
,
David Saltzman
,
2019/08/26
Re: [ft-devel] Why is FT_Fixed a long instead of FT_Int32?
,
Werner LEMBERG
,
2019/08/27
Re: [ft-devel] Why is FT_Fixed a long instead of FT_Int32?
,
David Saltzman
,
2019/08/27
Prev by Date:
[ft-devel] GSoC 2019 - Adding support for OpenType-SVG fonts to FreeType
Next by Date:
Re: [ft-devel] Why is FT_Fixed a long instead of FT_Int32?
Previous by thread:
[ft-devel] GSoC 2019 - Adding support for OpenType-SVG fonts to FreeType
Next by thread:
Re: [ft-devel] Why is FT_Fixed a long instead of FT_Int32?
Index(es):
Date
Thread