[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] Glitchy stroker output
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] Glitchy stroker output |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:58:59 +0200 (CEST) |
> Actually, I decided to take a closer look at the border outline.
Thanks a lot; I'll look at it closer soon.
> I do observe some differences between the core outline and the
> border outline; namely, the core outline has different tags (with
> undocumented bits set)
Those bits aren't really undocumented; have a look at the
FT_CURVE_TAG_XXX macros in ftimage.h. Consequently, your `switch'
statement isn't the correct solution; you should rather do a bitwise
comparison to check whether bit 0 orĀ 1 is set.
> and different flags, and a different arrangement of control points -
> two second-order control points between each pair of on-the-curve
> points.
Yes, the stroking algorithm constructs the outline from scratch; for
this reason, there are also much more points on it than on the
original outline.
Werner
- [ft] Glitchy stroker output, Stephan T. Lavavej, 2008/09/15
- Re: [ft] Glitchy stroker output, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/09/16
- RE: [ft] Glitchy stroker output, Stephan T. Lavavej, 2008/09/17
- RE: [ft] Glitchy stroker output, Stephan T. Lavavej, 2008/09/17
- Re: [ft] Glitchy stroker output,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft] Glitchy stroker output, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/09/17
- Re: [ft] Glitchy stroker output, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/09/19
- RE: [ft] Glitchy stroker output, Stephan T. Lavavej, 2008/09/19
- Re: [ft] Glitchy stroker output, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/09/19
- RE: [ft] Glitchy stroker output, Stephan T. Lavavej, 2008/09/19
- RE: [ft] Glitchy stroker output, Stephan T. Lavavej, 2008/09/20
- Re: [ft] Glitchy stroker output, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/09/20
- Re: [ft] Glitchy stroker output, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/09/20
- RE: [ft] Glitchy stroker output, Stephan T. Lavavej, 2008/09/20
- Re: [ft] Glitchy stroker output, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/09/21