[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" gl
From: |
Nigel Tao |
Subject: |
Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Oct 2013 22:49:42 +1100 |
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
> It's a bug in the interpreter, as far as I can see. I think it
> wrongly sets the phantom points for composite glyphs. This glyph is
> the first time ever I've seen an alignment on a vertical phantom
> point; this might be the reason that the problem hasn't been
> discovered earlier.
Another clue: the ttx file lists an hmtx table but no vmtx table...
- [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Nigel Tao, 2013/10/29
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/10/30
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Nigel Tao, 2013/10/30
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/10/30
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph,
Nigel Tao <=
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/10/30
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Nigel Tao, 2013/10/30
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/10/30
- Re: [ft] Large delta_y for hinted vs unhinted "COMBINING CARON BELOW" glyph, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/10/30