[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003
From: |
Chris Croughton |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003 |
Date: |
Mon, 19 May 2003 09:09:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 08:45:03PM +0100, Alex Hudson wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-05-17 at 14:22, Chris Croughton wrote:
> >
> > Please note that many of us who are supporters of free software are
> > /not/ anti-capitalist nor against 'globalisation' (at least some
> > definitions of it, it's a term which tends to be defined differently by
> > everyone who uses the term).
>
> I'm not sure he was necessarily saying that, more the other way around -
> that it's likely that 'those types' would be inclined to be supportive
> of Free Software, rather than that supporting Free Software makes you
> more likely to be 'one of them'.
I'll accept that it was not intended that way, but I think the Free
Software Movement has to be careful in associating itself with extremist
groups of any sort, or at least to keep a balance between them.
Since most people assume symmetrical relationships, it is likely to get
confused: "the Free Software community supports Marxism" (true, but it
supports everyone else as well) and from there it's a very easy step to
"people who support Free Software are Marxists", particularly because
the attitudes of several prominent people in the FS movement are indeed
anti-capitalist (those who rant that all 'proprietary' software is evil,
for instance). It makes it easy for certain companies and regimes which
benefit from state-capitalism to brand anyone who uses or writes Free
Software as 'commies'.
> AFFS is, of course, entirely non-political in those terms - we'd pretty
> much talk Free Software anywhere, unless it would be detrimental to our
> profile overall. I suspect, as you suggest, that the idea of Free
> Software fits into a number of political ideologies, so we have to be
> pretty agnostic IMO. I think I can probably say that we don't talk about
> ourselves being a socialist organisation or some such, no matter what
> the views of the committee/members/etc.
Would the organisation take a stall at a pro-capitalism or a
pro-globalisation rally? That would be needed for balance, I think.
Perhaps I'll have a go at writing an essay on Free Software from a
libertarian minarchist-capitalist perspective -- don't hold your breath,
I'm not fast at writing text I'm comfortable with distributing...
Chris C
- [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003, Timothy Baldwin, 2003/05/16
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003, Alex Hudson, 2003/05/16
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003, North London John, 2003/05/17
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003, Chris Croughton, 2003/05/17
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003, Alex Hudson, 2003/05/18
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003,
Chris Croughton <=
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003, Alex Hudson, 2003/05/19
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003, Mike Taylor, 2003/05/19
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003, MJ Ray, 2003/05/19
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003, Mike Taylor, 2003/05/19
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003, MJ Ray, 2003/05/19
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003, Robin Green, 2003/05/19
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003, Timothy Baldwin, 2003/05/27
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003, Timothy Baldwin, 2003/05/27
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Stalls at Marxism 2003, Mike Taylor, 2003/05/17