[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] OFT visit
From: |
MJ Ray |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] OFT visit |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Jun 2003 21:30:05 -0000 |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.7.4 (Linux) |
Andrew, you do not attribute quotes, so I cannot tell for sure what I
wrote. I'll just answer bits I have clear ideas about.
Andrew Atkinson <address@hidden> wrote:
>>No, the right result could be that the licence fees are calculated
>>based on machines using the licensed code, rather than just on number
> I agree that this is the right result, but I cannot see it happening.
That tells you more about the monopoly position than it does about the
justness of the complaint.
[...]
> The rest of the software producers have reduced the cost to schools, without
> the ridiculous clause of having to licence all machines
How has MS requiring licence purchase for all machines on a site caused
this? I don't see the link at all, other than by MS having already
claimed a huge chunk of school IT budgets, leaving less for competitors,
in a clear unfair practice.
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ jabber://address@hidden
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
Thought: "Changeset algebra is really difficult."
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] OFT visit, (continued)
- RE: [Fsfe-uk] OFT visit, Andrew Atkinson, 2003/06/06
- M$ Word -- Bad (was:Re: [Fsfe-uk] OFT visit), Ramanan Selvaratnam, 2003/06/06
- Re: M$ Word -- Bad (was:Re: [Fsfe-uk] OFT visit), Chris Croughton, 2003/06/06
- [Fsfe-uk] Re: M$ Word -- Bad, Ramanan Selvaratnam, 2003/06/06
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: M$ Word -- Bad, ian, 2003/06/07
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: M$ Word -- Bad, MJ Ray, 2003/06/13
- RE: [Fsfe-uk] OFT visit, ian, 2003/06/06
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] OFT visit,
MJ Ray <=
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] OFT visit, ian, 2003/06/06
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] OFT visit, Simon Waters, 2003/06/06