[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] SCO's latest
From: |
Paul Mobbs |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] SCO's latest |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Aug 2003 09:18:50 -0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 05 August 2003 22:46, Paul wrote:
> Just had this through from someone who attended a recent SCO reseller
> conference - it's a joke!
Just a suggestion...
If we can confirm this, legally anyone whom they demand this money from has a
right to receive legal justification as to why they are liable for the
charge. This is because they did not obtain the product with an explitcit
license according to the terms that SCO suggest apply. So why not get anyone
who uses Linux to email SCO - hopefully '000s - to demand the detailed legal
basis for the claim?
Bumps up their costs, a bit of extra administrative pressure on their legal
team, and perhaps helps to personalise the action between the Linux user
community and SCO rather than just the current SCO sideswipe at IBM and the
AIX system?
P.
==========
"We are not for names, nor men, nor titles of Government, nor are we for
this party nor against the other but we are for justice and mercy and
truth and peace and true freedom, that these may be exalted in our nation,
and that goodness, righteousness, meekness, temperance, peace and unity
with God, and with one another, that these things may abound."
(Edward Burroughs, 1659 - from 'Quaker Faith and Practice')
Paul Mobbs, Mobbs' Environmental Investigations,
3 Grosvenor Road, Banbury OX16 5HN, England
tel./fax (+44/0)1295 261864
email - address@hidden
website - http://www.fraw.org.uk/mobbsey.html
public key - http://www.fraw.org.uk/keylist.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFImWkWtEaNwM05jx0RAsIpAJ9hltmwuVjkmff4yPvjhNc29HsSywCgyb9V
QRsGsQoGO6x5iEysDhVPWGM=
=PQa5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----