|
From: | James Heald |
Subject: | Re: MEP positions (Was: Re: [Fsfe-uk] Swpat directive passed by 7 votes.) |
Date: | Fri, 21 May 2004 13:59:49 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 |
Tom Chance wrote:
On Friday 21 May 2004 11:51, James Heald wrote:Tom Chance wrote:We'd aim to do something far more readable too. The FFII one isn't exactly easy to read. Friends of the Earth have an excellent example of what we could do: http://www.foeeurope.org/euvotewatch/FoE's maths is bizarre though -- they count a 'no show' as equivalent to a full vote against.They do? I see two symbols: "unfriendly" and "did not vote".
Two different symbols, but they count them both the same way when it comes to ranking the parties (or they did when I last looked, a week ago).
Anyway, we can do the maths better, but the presentation is the important thing. It's obvious and accessible, unlike the current FFII tables. Something like this:http://www.tomchance.org.uk/tmpWe should be making every effort to reduce barriers to the data, even for geeks who are at home with statistics.
Agreed.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |