[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] MSN Thought Thieves
From: |
Alex Hudson |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] MSN Thought Thieves |
Date: |
Sat, 14 May 2005 11:23:41 +0100 |
On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 10:50 +0100, Lee Braiden wrote:
> I'm not sure that *no* IP is a good way to protect societal rights regarding
> IP. The issue is that IP should belong to all of society, rather than to
> individuals and corporations, imho.
If individuals/corps don't own "IP rights", who does, and how does that
differ from no-one owning them?
> > Obviously, there is an issue with winners being required to sign over IP
> > rights to Microsoft, but this project would be done with the intention
> > that we wouldn't win.
>
> I can't see any way to participate in this without legitimising Microsoft's
> unethical approach to IP
How does attempting to show up their motives legitimise them? It is
better to let this pass without any comment?
Cheers,
Alex.
Re: [Fsfe-uk] MSN Thought Thieves, Philip Hunt, 2005/05/14
Re: [Fsfe-uk] MSN Thought Thieves, Jason Clifford, 2005/05/15