[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] MSN Thought Thieves
From: |
Robin Green |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] MSN Thought Thieves |
Date: |
Sat, 14 May 2005 12:11:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 11:55:42AM +0100, Lee Braiden wrote:
> > How does attempting to show up their motives legitimise them? It is
> > better to let this pass without any comment?
>
> Because your motivations for participating will be given little if any
> attention, whereas your participation will at least be registered in the
> numbers of people who took part.
On the contrary, I think this could create a good bit of media buzz if
successful. El Reg or Slashdot might cover it.
> This argument comes up with voting too: is it better to vote for parties you
> don't agree with, and even a system of voting that you don't agree with? Or
> would it be better for people to stay away en-masse, and therefore to
> invalidate the election, forcing the powers that be to establish a better
> election system and then try again?
Or would it be better to vote for a party that _does_ want to change the
electoral system, such as for example the Liberal Democrats or the Greens?
That's saying something rather than nothing.
--
Robin
pgpnK_NkAGk1S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [Fsfe-uk] MSN Thought Thieves, Philip Hunt, 2005/05/14
Re: [Fsfe-uk] MSN Thought Thieves, Jason Clifford, 2005/05/15