[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Resignation from AFFS committee
From: |
MJ Ray |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Resignation from AFFS committee |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Jun 2005 18:37:51 +0100 |
Graham Seaman wrote:
> How can you have the 'required majority' outside a meeting, whether
> minuted or not?
I can't answer most of your questions for you, but I can this.
There's a standing order allowing a resolution-by-email if
an absolute majority support a proposal - more controversial
ones should still go to an actual meeting. The order is
http://www.affs.org.uk/~mjr/admin/rfc-emailres.txt - I don't
recall any amendment, but I'm sure that I don't have a
complete archive of ctte emails.
I counted 3 for, 1 abstaining and 2 not voting, which isn't 4 for.
All the numbers get a bit dodgy with a half-full committee.
--
MJ Ray (slef), K. Lynn, England, email see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: AFFS workings, (continued)
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: AFFS workings, Alex Hudson, 2005/06/29
- Re: AFFS workings (was: [Fsfe-uk] Resignation from AFFS committee), Adam Bower, 2005/06/29
- Re: AFFS workings (was: [Fsfe-uk] Resignation from AFFS committee), MJ Ray, 2005/06/29
- Re: AFFS workings (was: [Fsfe-uk] Resignation from AFFS committee), Adam Bower, 2005/06/29
- [Fsfe-uk] Re: AFFS workings, Graham Seaman, 2005/06/29
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: AFFS workings, Adam Bower, 2005/06/29
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: AFFS workings, Andrew Savory, 2005/06/29
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: AFFS workings, Adam Bower, 2005/06/29
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: AFFS workings, Alex Hudson, 2005/06/29
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: AFFS workings, Andrew Savory, 2005/06/29
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Resignation from AFFS committee,
MJ Ray <=