[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates
From: |
Ralph Corderoy |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jan 2008 16:30:36 +0000 |
Hi Chris,
> > Whilst you're listing text-based mail clients, there's nmh, but it
> > doesn't like HTML either.
> >
> > http://www.nongnu.org/nmh/
> > http://rand-mh.sourceforge.net/book/overall/whymh.html
> >
> > There's not a lot of development work being done on it these days
> > though.
>
> Ye gods, I'd managed to forget mh. Self-defence I think. Even the
> old mali(1) client was less bad. It was probably fine when people
> only got a couple of messages a day and didn't need to thread
> conversations, but even it havving a command line interface doesn't
> get my vote.
On the contrary, it was created in order to cope with a heavy mail load
each day, though possibly not heavy by today's standards. They ran a
support desk IIRC. I find I can type commands to filter this 20,000
email folder quickly, giving the results names for later use.
# Search all emails in current folder for those with a subject
# containing `horizon' that are from washington and were sent over a
# week ago.
pick -sub horizon -and -from washington -and -before -7 -sequence horiz
pick -su horizon -an -f washington -an -b -7 -seq horiz
# List the first ten, one per line.
scan horiz:10
With personal ~/bin scripts like -sub for `pick ${0##*/} "$@" && scan
lp' and `sc' for `scan last:20' it gets quicker. And I can mix its
commands up with awk, sort, etc., for the more unusual cases.
Pine seemed to be too tedious for frequent use, and although my fingers
breathe vi I could never see the point of them learning mutt just to do
email. That was from years ago though, perhaps things have improved.
Cheers,
Ralph.
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, (continued)
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Jon Grant, 2008/01/25
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Paul Waring, 2008/01/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Sam Liddicott, 2008/01/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Paul Waring, 2008/01/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Chris Croughton, 2008/01/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Jon Grant, 2008/01/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Alex Hudson, 2008/01/26
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Chris Croughton, 2008/01/27
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Ralph Corderoy, 2008/01/27
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Chris Croughton, 2008/01/27
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates,
Ralph Corderoy <=
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Chris Croughton, 2008/01/27
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Ralph Corderoy, 2008/01/27
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Jon Grant, 2008/01/27
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Chris Croughton, 2008/01/27
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Jon Grant, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Chris Croughton, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Andrew Savory, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Chris Croughton, 2008/01/28
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] Administrivia: html duplicates, Sam Liddicott, 2008/01/28
- [Fsfe-uk] Re: Administrivia: html duplicates, Matt Blissett, 2008/01/29