[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] *features*
From: |
Michael Koehne |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] *features* |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Apr 2004 04:18:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
Moin David,
> > i tried to reach CVS over the last days - without any luck ;(
> > it looks as if my CVS version is clear out of date - the newest
> > file is from 24 nov ... CVS/Root is :
> > :pserver:address@hidden:/cvsroot/gcl
> That won't work now. Security has been tightened.
> See http://savannah.gnu.org/cvs/?group=gcl
thanks for that URL - download was fine, the *features* problem
claiming my system to be a BSD368 with MC68020 still exist and
looks trivial to patch. Questions here :
the other GNU Common Lisp's I tested [1] had every symbol in the
*feature* list prefixed with a ":". So UNIX should be :UNIX, even
if any of the reader macro's ignored the (non)existence of the ":",
when asking for #+UNIX. I now wonder, if the ":" prefix is necesary
by the ansi specs or just by the beauty of source.
with kind regards,
Michael
[1]: GCL, ECL, CLISP, ARMEDBEAR - are there any other Lisp's qualifying
for being free in term of GNU and Common Lisp in terms of ANSI ?
elisp is the most common GNU lisp - but its not Common Lisp ;)
--
mailto:address@hidden UNA:+.? 'CED+2+:::Linux:2.4.22'UNZ+1'
http://www.xml-edifact.org/ CETERUM CENSEO WINDOWS ESSE DELENDAM
Re: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Camm Maguire, 2004/04/16
- RE: [Gcl-devel] 2.6.2....., Billinghurst, David (CALCRTS), 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gcl-devel] *features*,
Michael Koehne <=
- Re: [Gcl-devel] *features*, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gcl-devel] *features*, Michael Koehne, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gcl-devel] *features*, Camm Maguire, 2004/04/16
- Message not available
- [Gcl-devel] Re: *features* - patch, Camm Maguire, 2004/04/19
- [Gcl-devel] Re: *features* - patch, Michael Koehne, 2004/04/19
- Message not available
- [Gcl-devel] Re: delayed pathname.d patch, Camm Maguire, 2004/04/22
- RE: [Gcl-devel] Re: delayed pathname.d patch, Mike Thomas, 2004/04/22
- RE: [Gcl-devel] Re: delayed pathname.d patch, Bill Page, 2004/04/22
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: delayed pathname.d patch, Camm Maguire, 2004/04/23
- RE: [Gcl-devel] Re: delayed pathname.d patch, Mike Thomas, 2004/04/27