[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gcl-devel] Re: (Summary view of above)
From: |
Chris Hall |
Subject: |
[Gcl-devel] Re: (Summary view of above) |
Date: |
16 Apr 2004 04:07:54 -1000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
(Sorry, I was sooo happy to finally get a usable GCL setup after more
than week of trying, I'm afraid that I went on a bit.) Here are the
key bits:
* Build process: it seems to me, as a new 'customer' of GCL, that it
might make sense to --enable-ansi by default, esp. since ILISP only
seems to work with the ANSI build. If people want faster, smaller
builds, then they should --disable-ansi.
* ANSI/non-ANSI toggling: does the ANSI build revert to CLtL1 based on
$GCL_ANSI? Or should I have the non-ANSI saved_gcl available as
well?
* ILISP: I'm not clear if --enable-ansi was required to make ILISP
work, but I think it might be due to the different default package
names, i.e. USER vs. COMMON-LISP-USER. I couldn't figure out how to
run an init script and change the GCL's active package when ILISP
started it, though I see now that the shell script
/usr/local/bin/gcl has an example.
* Does anyone know of a workaround for the SETF
LOGICAL-PATHNAME-TRANSLATIONS issue?
--
Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad
judgment.
- Jim Horning
Re: [Gcl-devel] Happy!; ILISP+GCL; Building GCL, Camm Maguire, 2004/04/16