[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] [Maxima-discuss] gcl vs sbcl vs ccl
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] [Maxima-discuss] gcl vs sbcl vs ccl |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Nov 2014 21:01:28 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Greetings! If you could step me through the installation of 64bit mingw
or cygwin on a Win7 machine, I think I can get a 64bit gcl port very
quickly.
Take care,
Kilian Singer <address@hidden> writes:
> Dear all,
> currently sbcl and ccl seems to be no option under windows.
> I compared the 32 bit versions with run_testsuite();
> here are the results:
> gcl: 1:35 min no err
> sbcl: 1:59 min 7 tests failed
> ccl: 2:05 min 1 test failed
>
> So the route to go seems to improve the object loader of gcl which
> currently is limited to 32 bit address space.
>
> Best regards
> Kilian
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
> Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month.
> Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications.
> Take corrective actions from your mobile device.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Maxima-discuss mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maxima-discuss
>
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- Re: [Gcl-devel] [Maxima-discuss] gcl vs sbcl vs ccl,
Camm Maguire <=