[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] building gcl-2.6.12: raw_gcl segfaults
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] building gcl-2.6.12: raw_gcl segfaults |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Oct 2016 12:57:12 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Greetings! Make can run subjobs in constrained environments. Can you
post 'strace -f ....' of both?
Take care,
"Andrey G. Grozin" <address@hidden> writes:
> Something really strange is happening (absolutely reproducibly). I
> cannot understand.
>
> After this failure in the build process, make removes raw_gcl. This is
> inconvenient for debugging. Therefore I removed it from .INTERMEDIATE
> in the makefile in unixport. I run make in the toplevel directpry, and
> get
>
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-lisp/gcl-2.6.12/work/gcl/unixport/raw_gcl
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-lisp/gcl-2.6.12/work/gcl/unixport/ -libdir
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-lisp/gcl-2.6.12/work/gcl/ < foo
>
> Unrecoverable error: Segmentation violation..
>
> (the first 3 lines here are, of course, 1 line split by the email
> client). But now raw_gcl is still here. So, I run by hand
>
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-lisp/gcl-2.6.12/work/gcl/unixport/raw_gcl
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-lisp/gcl-2.6.12/work/gcl/unixport/ -libdir
> /var/tmp/portage/dev-lisp/gcl-2.6.12/work/gcl/ < foo
>
> (the same 1 line). And it succeeds and produces saved_gcl!
>
> Why does this line fail when started by make, but succeeds when
> started from the command line??
>
> Andrey
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah