[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gfsd]Re: address@hidden: [Savannah-hackers] new package: qexo]
From: |
Loic Dachary |
Subject: |
[gfsd]Re: address@hidden: [Savannah-hackers] new package: qexo] |
Date: |
Thu, 9 May 2002 08:48:17 +0200 |
Ok, I'll turn it (in a hurry before leaving).
Hugo Gayosso writes:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Loic Dachary <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I'm a bit embarassed because I can't seem to find a trace of
> > the fact that Qexo is part of the GNU project. However Per Bothner
> > is well known and I suspect he would not ask this modification if
> > Qexo was not indeed part of the GNU project. Can you provide some
> > feedback on this please ?
>
>
> Executive summary:
>
> Yes Qexo was dubbed GNU software by RMS on May 3rd. 2002
>
> new-gnu: please DTRT with qexo.
>
>
>
> Details of the investigation:
>
> This kind of questions can be better answered by <address@hidden>,
> but I will try to do my best.
>
>
> fencepost$ grep -i qexo /gd/gnuorg/maintainers
> [ Nothing ]
>
> So this would mean that it is NOT a GNU package, but let's do some
> more research:
>
> $ grep -i qexo /com/archive/new-gnu
> Subject: Qexo
> I hereby dub qexo a GNU package.
> new-gnu people, could you please enter qexo in gnuorg/maintainers,
> Subject: Qexo
> I hereby dub qexo a GNU package.
> new-gnu people, could you please enter qexo in gnuorg/maintainers,
> Subject: Qexo
> I hereby dub qexo a GNU package.
> new-gnu people, could you please enter qexo in gnuorg/maintainers,
>
>
>
> Ah!, at least there is something there, digging the message from the
> archive, I found that it was sent by RMS on: Fri, 3 May 2002 12:25:52
> - -0600 (MDT)
>
> So, I guess the new-gnu people hasn't had the chance to update
> maintainers, but Qexo is in fact a GNU package as of that date.
>
> Doing some more research, I didn't receive that message (I receive
> messages sent to new-gnu), so I guess that maybe the new-gnu people
> didn't receive it either (I am copying them here). Another
> interesting fact is that there are three copies of the message in the
> archive!
>
> Mail system problems??
>
> Greetings,
> - --
> Hugo Gayosso
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE82c2qMNObVRBZveYRAmwEAKCM/Un5jRqE9PoMZvMlRrOPsWKFUgCgkrEk
> FqNqryVUjoGAx/WY8/ybt6g=
> =AJBg
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----