Re: [Gluster-devel] Local vs unify

[Gareth Bult]

Hi, 

Sorry, I didn't think Gluster was anything other than GPL, nor was I trying to 
imply you have more than one version ... 

All I was doing was responding to comments on the list saying "it's not 
production ready" when you guys are offering it up as a commercial solution. 

Gareth. 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Amar S. Tumballi" <address@hidden> 
To: "Gareth Bult" <address@hidden> 
Cc: "Brandon Lamb" <address@hidden>, address@hidden 
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 3:55:46 PM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, 
Portugal 
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Local vs unify 






Ok, let's be clear here, so far as I can seem GlusterFS is available as a 
commercial product. 
http://www.zresearch.com/subscription.php 

One of my points was that there is a HEAVY implication that this IS a 
production ready environment. 
This is liable to encourage people who are doing a little more than just 
"playing". 

Is this not a typical open sourced project model, release a free product and 
feed the free testing results back into the commercial model? I have nothing 
against this, this is normal. All I am attempting to do is to point out issues 
that in the interests of both the open source and commercial users - could do 
with being addressed. 

Hi Gareth and all in the list, 
If you are thinking that we are having two models, a opensource and another 
commercial, you have mistaken us. We have just one product which is released 
with GPLv3. The subscription is for the same version. 

Regards, 
Amar 



-- 
Amar Tumballi 
Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker 
[bulde on #gluster/ irc.gnu.org ] 
http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Super Storage!