Re: [Gluster-devel] Crawling and indexing hardware

[Marcus Herou]

No it's of course not a working solution. But what I meant is that you
should not trust the storage medium too much.

or drbd perhaps ?

/Marcus

On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 2:12 PM, <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Fri, 9 May 2008, Marcus Herou wrote:
>
>  Ok so the mantra is: Backup as often as you can afford :)
>>
>
> I don't really see that as being a workable solution.
>
>  However if an index is corrupt it's not a big deal since the data is not
>> connected to the
>> index itself but rather stored elsewhere. Actually it will probably be
>> stored with GlusterFS
>> as well but with another access pattern which I hope will not run int
>> these issues. This data
>> will probably be rolled out on tape or such every night and a hot backup
>> be kept somewhere
>> just in case.
>>
>
> The problem is that hot backups will also be synced to the old version.
> Something like CopyFS on top of GlusterFS might give you what you need WRT
> backups, but I'm not sure how that would cope with versioning number resets
> and suchlike, and whether a broken sync would utterly break it.
>
>
> Gordan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>



-- 
Marcus Herou CTO and co-founder Tailsweep AB
+46702561312
address@hidden
http://www.tailsweep.com/
http://blogg.tailsweep.com/