[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] Setup recommendations - 2 (io-threads)
From: |
Raghavendra G |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] Setup recommendations - 2 (io-threads) |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:42:04 +0400 |
Hi Martin,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Martin Fick <address@hidden> wrote:
> --- On Thu, 5/15/08, Amar S. Tumballi <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > ''io-threads'' translator creates seperate
> > threads (as specified by the option). But, it doesn't
> > make sense to have more threads than number of CPUs
> > available. It works good if the thread
> > count is same as number of CPUs you have in server.
>
> Could you please explain the reasoning behind this statement?
> Wouldn't adding multiple threads on a single CPU server still
> allow a server thread to potentially serve files to other
> clients while it is blocked serving one client?
Couple of points to be noted are,
* Apart from the io-threads, there is a separate fuse thread which
reads/writes to /dev/fuse.
* Since glusterfs operates in asynchronous framework, potentially there are
very less scenarios, where a thread can block.
Hence the purpose of io-threads is only for simultaneous executions. And the
number of simultaneous execution paths is determined by the number of
processors present.
Can anyone confirm this?
>
> -Martin
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>
--
Raghavendra G
A centipede was happy quite, until a toad in fun,
Said, "Prey, which leg comes after which?",
This raised his doubts to such a pitch,
He fell flat into the ditch,
Not knowing how to run.
-Anonymous