gluster-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gluster-devel] posix-locks under AFR not working for server+client


From: Krishna Srinivas
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] posix-locks under AFR not working for server+client in one process
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:04:02 +0530

Hi Rommer,
Can you paste the spec file of the other server too?
Thanks
Krishna

On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Rommer <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello Everybody,
>
> I'm testing glusterfs on two nodes, and found one problem.
> I decided to use one process as server and client, cause of
> best performance in my case. This is my configuration file:
>
> ####### local brick #########
> volume posix
>  type storage/posix
>  option directory /mnt/export
> end-volume
> volume posix-locks
>  type features/posix-locks
>  subvolumes posix
> end-volume
> volume io-thr
>  type performance/io-threads
>  subvolumes posix-locks
>  option thread-count 4
> end-volume
>
> #### export local brick #####
> volume server
>  type protocol/server
>  subvolumes io-thr
>  option transport-type tcp/server
>  option bind-address 192.168.1.12
>  option auth.ip.io-thr.allow 192.168.1.*
> end-volume
>
> ####### remote bricks #######
> volume remote
>  type protocol/client
>  option transport-type tcp/client
>  option remote-host 192.168.1.13
>  option remote-subvolume io-thr
>  option transport-timeout 3
> end-volume
>
> ########### afr #############
> volume afr
>  type cluster/afr
>  subvolumes io-thr remote
>  option read-subvolume io-thr
> end-volume
> volume wb
>  type performance/write-behind
>  subvolumes afr
> end-volume
> volume ra
>  type performance/read-ahead
>  subvolumes wb
> end-volume
> #############################
>
> Mounting on both nodes by:
> # glusterfs --spec-file=/etc/glusterfs/glfs.vol -n ra /mnt/glusterfs
>
> However, locking doesn't work in that configuration.
> I can still lock the same file on both nodes at the same time.
>
> If I use server (glusterfsd) and client (glusterfs) as separated
> processes, the same lock tests work perfectly.
>
> Rommer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]