gluster-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gluster-devel] Is it possible to setup a RAID 6 using GlusterFS?


From: John Mark Walker
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Is it possible to setup a RAID 6 using GlusterFS?
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:18:55 -0400 (EDT)

Xavier,

I missed this the first time around - this sounds really awesome. Please do let 
us know if you need any help.

Thanks!
JM


----- Original Message -----
> Xavier, this sounds cool. Please keep me and John Mark in the loop.
> We
> will make sure you are getting all the help you needed from Red Hat.
> -ab
> 
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Xavier Hernandez
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hello David,
> >
> >
> >
> > we aren't the core developers of GlusterFS, but we are developing a
> > new
> > translator that will be able to implement something similar to a
> > RAID6. In
> > fact it will be able to have a configurable level of redundacy. A
> > redundancy
> > of 1 is equivalent to RAID 5; a redundancy of 2 is equivalent to
> > RAID 6; and
> > higher levels of redundancy are supported.
> >
> >
> >
> > We are also trying to improve performance over replicate by using a
> > new
> > contention detection and locking mecanism, but no promises about
> > that yet.
> >
> >
> >
> > We plan to begin internal tests soon. When we consider it stable,
> > we will
> > release a first beta.
> >
> >
> >
> > Xavi
> >
> > On 29.03.2012 17:14, Pascal wrote:
> >
> > Am Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:02:38 -0400
> > schrieb David Coulson <address@hidden>:
> >
> > Sorry for confusion, I understood you wrong in the first place. Now
> > I
> > guess I know what you mean and I will think about it.
> >
> > Are there more suggestions or official plans from the GlusterFS
> > developers?
> >
> > Not following. If you have a replica count of 3, you can lose two
> > boxes in
> > that group and still have access to all your data. It's more like a
> > 3-way
> > RAID-1 than anything like RAID-6. On 3/29/12 11:00 AM, Pascal
> > wrote:
> >
> > Am Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:47:38 -0400 schrieb David
> > Coulson<address@hidden>: Hello David, thanks for your quick
> > reply. I
> > already considered a replica count of 3 (and six servers at all,
> > correct?),
> > but the problem would still be that two hard drives from the same
> > "replica
> > group" were not allowed to fail at the same time.
> >
> > Try doing a distributed-replica with a replica count of 3. Not
> > really
> > 'RAID-6' comparable, but you can have two nodes fail without
> > outage.
> > http://download.gluster.com/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.2/Documentation/AG/html/sect-Administration_Guide--Setting_Volumes-Distributed_Replicated.htmlOn
> > 3/29/12 10:39 AM, Pascal wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone, I would like to know if it is possible to setup a
> > GlusterFS
> > installation which is comparable to a RAID 6? I did some research
> > in the
> > community and several mailing lists and all I could find were the
> > similar
> > request from 2009
> > (http://gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2009-May/002208.html,
> > http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.ph/Talk:GlusterFS_Roadmap_Suggestions).
> > I would just like to have a scenario where two GlusterFS
> > nodes/servers,
> > respectively their hard drives, could fail at the same time. Thanks
> > in
> > advance! Pascal _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list address@hidden
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel
> > mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gluster-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Anand Babu Periasamy
> Blog [ http://www.unlocksmith.org ]
> Twitter [ http://twitter.com/abperiasamy ]
> 
> Imagination is more important than knowledge --Albert Einstein
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]