Re: [Gluster-devel] Fedora (f18), revised packaging for glusterfs

[Joe Julian]

If GlusterFS support is being pushed to the OpenStack project, then I think it 
shouldn't be in the gluster rpms. 

Vijay Bellur <address@hidden> wrote:

>On 08/08/2012 11:57 PM, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
>> Currently the glusterfs*-3.3.0 RPMs in Fedora 18 do not contain the UFO 
>> feature.
>>
>> As I work on revising the Fedora RPM packaging for 3.3.x, my intention is to 
>> cons up a single .spec that produces glusterfs + UFO. I.e. UFO = swift + 
>> gluster plug-in. But the RPMs  that gluster.org released were a mix of 
>> *-3.3.0*, *-1.4.8*, and *-1.0.2* for glusterfs*, gluster-swift*, and 
>> gluster-swift-plugin. Kinda ugly IMO.
>>
>> I propose to produce a set of RPMs that are all glusterfs*-3.3.x*. If I did 
>> this right now, everything in f18 would be glusterfs*-3.3.0-4*, with 
>> swift-1.4.8.
>
>UFO = Patched Swift + gluster plug-in. Till the Swift patch from 
>Gluster is accepted in a release, we will need the patched Swift RPM for 
>gluster plug-in to work. Bumping up the plugin version to 3.3 does sound 
>fine to me.
>
>
>Thanks,
>Vijay
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gluster-devel mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel