Re: [Gluster-devel] Translator test harness

[Luis Pabon]

I'm definitely up for it, not just for the translators, but as Avati 
pointed out, a test harness for the GlusterFS system.  I think, if 
possible, that the translator test harness is really a subclass a 
GlusterFS unit/functional test environment.

I am currently in the process of qualifying some C Unit test frameworks 
(specifically those that provide mock frameworks -- Cmock, cmockery) to 
propose to the GlusterFS community as a foundation to the 
unit/functional tests environment.

What I would like to see, and I still have a hard time finding, is a 
source coverage tool for C.  Anyone know of one?

- Luis

On 11/18/2013 09:34 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> Last week, Luis and I had a discussion about unit testing translator 
> code.  Unfortunately, the structure of a translator - a plugin with 
> many entry points which interact in complex and instance-specific ways 
> - is one that is notoriously challenging. Really, the only way to do 
> it is to have some sort of a task-specific harness, with at least the 
> following parts:
>
> * Code above to inject requests.
>
> * Code below to provide mocked replies to the translator's own requests.
>
> * Code "on the side" to track things like resources or locks acquired 
> and released.
>
> This would be an ambitious undertaking, but not so ambitious that it's 
> beyond reason.  The benefits should be obvious.  At this point, what 
> I'm most interested in is volunteers to help define the requirements 
> and scope so that we can propose this as a feature or task for some 
> future GlusterFS release.  Who's up for it?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel