[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for some RPM packaging changes
|
From: |
Niels de Vos |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] Proposal for some RPM packaging changes |
|
Date: |
Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:45:51 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:21:10AM -0500, James wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Niels de Vos <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 1. glusterfs-server (glusterd) and glusterfs-geo-replication depend on
> > each other. It is not possible to install glusterfs-server without
> > glusterfs-geo-replication, or the other way around.
>
> The only question I would have is why does glusterfs-server, depend on
> geo-replication?
I assumed this was because glusterd links against some library that is
contained in glusterfs-geo-replication. Upon further inspection, this
does not seem to be the case. I think I have confused this packaging
issue with a dependency that is introduced in the Red Hat Storage
version of the packages. I'm currently checking why this was done, and
if merging glusterfs-geo-replication in glusterfs-server is really
needed, or not.
Thanks,
Niels