"warnings" on clang, are related to strict C99 checks
since gluster is solely developed on GNU platforms it kind of ends up
using GNU extensions. We will get to this subsequently.
How about adding C99 to gcc compiling as well?
To suppress some of those warnings we have to shift "clang -std=gnu89", but it
seems to be rather Xcode/Clang related as it does more stricter compilation.
yeah I saw that when I tried.
Current upstream code is not compiled against gnu99 rather its gnu90 as default.
According to gcc's documentation their C99 support is substantial but
not complete.
The "warnings" i guess are okay for now, we can get to it slowly
unless they are
really killing the functionality.
I am for now adding -Wno-* to clang compilation. We should fix them as we get time. Some of them I think is pretty basic, but there are some which I am not sure about. A few looks like wrong code while other could be relevant for other platform (unsigned char , size_t < 0). But I guess I would like a second opinion on these.
cheers, :-Dennis |