Re: [Gluster-devel] Smoke test question

[Luis Pabon]

Hi Justin,
    I did not use GlusterFS on the host system, I tried just using XFS 
and ext4 to see if it would pass posix-compliance, but the issue is that 
they do not.  My hope is that someone shows me that I am doing something 
wrong, or forgot some switch because it just seems weird that they 
cannot pass on local filesystems.

- Luis

On 04/14/2014 10:45 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 15/04/2014, at 3:11 AM, Luis Pabon wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >     I am investigating running smoke tests inside Docker.io, but I cannot seem 
> > to pass the posix-compliance tests.  I then tried to run the posix-compliance 
> > tests on XFS and EXT4 but I could make them pass there either.  This is what I 
> > did:
> >
> > $ truncate -s 5G mydisk
> > $ sudo mkfs.xfs mydisk
> > $ sudo mount -o loop mydisk /mnt
> > $ cd /mnt
> > * Change the value of 'fs' in ~/qa/tools/posix-compliance/conf according to the 
> > file system format.
> > $ prove -r ~/qa/tools/posix-compliance/tests
> >
> > They always fail on chown tests.  Anyone know why?
> Which OS, and which release or git repo branch of Gluster?
>
> If CentOS 6.5 and upstream master, then what kernel version are you
> running?  I had problems with one of the recent CentOS 6.5 kernels, but
> a subsequent update to the newest one about a week ago
> (<something>11.<something> in the name) fixed it.
>
> + Justin
>
>
> > - Luis
> --
> Open Source and Standards @ Red Hat
>
> twitter.com/realjustinclift