[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance p
From: |
Sandro Santilli |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem) |
Date: |
Wed, 9 May 2007 09:44:04 +0200 |
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:44:43PM +0800, zou lunkai wrote:
> >
> >If what Zou is saying in IRC is correct it should only use
> >_scriptTransformed
> >instead:
> >
> >12:21 < zou> PLACE and REPLACE need to support an ID for the new
> >character, PLACE, MOVE, REPLACE all use dpeth to refer the old character.
> >12:22 < strk> Ok, so my question above was: will MOVE or REPLACE tags be
> >effective no matter what kind of instance is found at the specified depth
> >of the old
> > character ?
> >12:25 < zou> yes, I think so. no matter what occupies the specified depth.
> >
> sorry, I take back my words. As testcases committed today show that
> MOVE tag is *not* effective to as-created movie clips. And I don't
> know how to test REPLACE tags.
We worked at the definition of an algorithm for resetting the DisplayList
on jump-backs: http://www.gnashdev.org/wiki/index.php/TimelineControl
Can you confirm the efectiveness of the the model described under the
DisplayList_reconstruction section ?
--strk;
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), (continued)
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/08
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Sandro Santilli, 2007/05/08
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/08
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Sandro Santilli, 2007/05/08
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/08
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Sandro Santilli, 2007/05/08
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/08
- Re[3]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/08
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), zou lunkai, 2007/05/09
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem),
Sandro Santilli <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), zou lunkai, 2007/05/10
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/10
- Re: Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), zou lunkai, 2007/05/10
- Re: Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), zou lunkai, 2007/05/10
- Re[4]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/10
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Sandro Santilli, 2007/05/10
- Re[2]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/10
- Re[3]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/10
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Sandro Santilli, 2007/05/10
- Re[4]: [Gnash-dev] Re: gotoAndPlay bug in Gnash (was: Serious performance problem), Udo Giacomozzi, 2007/05/10