|
From: | Martin Guy |
Subject: | Re: [Gnash-dev] FSF copyright notices slightly off |
Date: | Tue, 29 May 2007 14:19:28 +0100 |
The question isn't if the code is GPL (all the gnash code is GPL), the question is if the copyright can be assigned to FSF.
I thought there should be the GPL boilerplate in each source file for it to be legally binding. Mind u, GPLing PD code seems similar to the sort of thing the GPL was designed to prevent. http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/maintain.html#Copyright-Notices --------------------- If a file has been explicitly placed in the public domain, then instead of a copyright notice, it should have a notice saying explicitly that it is in the public domain. --------------------- ... which they do. I suppose we wait until significant modifications have taken place and meantime put a note in the header that it has been modified for Gnash. M
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |