[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash] Gnash speed and free software
From: |
Tomas Groth |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash] Gnash speed and free software |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Jul 2006 13:28:33 +0200 (CEST) |
Hi,
> >
> >> I tried Gnash and it's good to have such a nice tool.
> >>
> >> One cons: as it was already reported, it is really slow. I read that
> >> it is recommended to get a 3D card to cope with that.
> >>
> >> However these days, all the 3D cards out there require proprietary
> >> drivers to be useful in this regard.
> >>
> >> What would you recommend to get a usable Gnash on a completely free OS?
> >>
> > If 3d acceleration isn't an option, perhaps some serious assembler word
> could
> > do it... As i understand it, that's how macromedia does it.
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > Tomas
>
> Doing some benchs at rendering SWF, I found that AGG
> (http://www.antigrain.com) perform better than Flash, and it's written
> in portable C++ code.
>
That's interesting, maybe we should have a look at AGG as a possible redering
backend. BTW, how did you run benchmarks?
Tomas
- Re: [Gnash] Gnash speed and free software, Nicolas Cannasse, 2006/07/01
- Re: [Gnash] Gnash speed and free software,
Tomas Groth <=
- Re: [Gnash] Gnash speed and free software, Timo Jyrinki, 2006/07/19
- Re: [Gnash] Gnash speed and free software, Rob Savoye, 2006/07/19
- Re: [Gnash] Gnash speed and free software, kfs1, 2006/07/19
- Re[2]: [Gnash] Gnash speed and free software, Udo Giacomozzi, 2006/07/20
- Re: [Gnash] Gnash speed and free software, Rob Savoye, 2006/07/20
- Re[2]: [Gnash] Gnash speed and free software, Udo Giacomozzi, 2006/07/20
- Re: [Gnash] Gnash speed and free software, Rob Savoye, 2006/07/20
- Re[2]: [Gnash] Gnash speed and free software, Udo Giacomozzi, 2006/07/21