[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?
From: |
Matthew Flaschen |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ? |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Apr 2007 13:37:24 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070306) |
Yoni Rabkin Katzenell wrote:
> First and foremost: Free as in "OKed by the FSF".
I don't need their explicit approval, but it should fit their criteria
(except that I will tolerate them distributing proprietary software in
completely separate repositories).
> Second: Backed by an organization/corporation that is committed to not
> being evil (and I don't mean Google).
I'll judge them by their actions.
> So far, I don't understand how this "Glossy GNU" (or whatever it will be
> called) can possibly pass the first criterion if in order to support it
> and use it I'll have to the non-free Launchpad.
Right. Launchpad can not be the basis for a free distribution. That
would fail my criteria. I have heard rumors that it will be released
under the GPL the same time as Gutsy Gibbon, which would remove that
objection.
Matthew Flaschen
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, (continued)
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Matthew Flaschen, 2007/04/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Yoni Rabkin Katzenell, 2007/04/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Kevin Dean, 2007/04/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Karl Goetz, 2007/04/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Yoni Rabkin Katzenell, 2007/04/14
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Andrew Wigglesworth, 2007/04/16
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Yoni Rabkin Katzenell, 2007/04/16
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Mitch Wiedemann, 2007/04/16
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Kevin Dean, 2007/04/16
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Koh Choon Lin, 2007/04/16
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?,
Matthew Flaschen <=