[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?
From: |
Mitch Wiedemann |
Subject: |
Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ? |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:59:14 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Icedove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070329) |
Yoni Rabkin Katzenell wrote:
>> Canonical's move (if it happens) can hardly be put in the same category.
>>
>
> I'm not trying to be facetious, but I can't imagine why not.
>
Perhaps it's a matter of relativity. Canonical, while creating a more
free version of their product is at the same time creating a less-free
version. Why should they get props from the FSF for making people less
free than they were the version before?
Java is moving in a forward direction: Less free --> more free.
--
Mitch Wiedemann
Ithaca Free Software Association http://ithacafreesoftware.org
Free Software Foundation Member #3167 http://www.fsf.org
PGP: 0xEF98FDB9
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, (continued)
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Matthew Flaschen, 2007/04/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Yoni Rabkin Katzenell, 2007/04/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Kevin Dean, 2007/04/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Karl Goetz, 2007/04/13
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Yoni Rabkin Katzenell, 2007/04/14
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Andrew Wigglesworth, 2007/04/16
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Yoni Rabkin Katzenell, 2007/04/16
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?,
Mitch Wiedemann <=
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Kevin Dean, 2007/04/16
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Koh Choon Lin, 2007/04/16
- Re: [gNewSense-users] Glossy GNU ?, Matthew Flaschen, 2007/04/13