[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gNewSense-users] KFV question no licence or author

From: Karl Goetz
Subject: Re: [gNewSense-users] KFV question no licence or author
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 09:04:36 +1030

On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 18:28 -0400, Bake Timmons wrote:
> > A work "Under the GPL" needs no clarification. a work without a
> > copyright notice should get clarificatio.
> Although I have documented files with GPL2 in this case for KFV, I am
> perfectly happy simply repeating "Under the GPL", *especially* since the
> script I use always includes the original file comment to remove all
> doubts.

sounds reasonable enough. one day i'll have to download the mode/script
just to see what all the fuss is about ;)

> > We can only distribute under GPL2 in the context of Linux. if you take
> > the same  GPL'd code (with no GPL version specified) you could then
> > include it in a GPL3 project and distribute it as GPL3.
> > kk
> I agree about the Linux context and would be happy to agree with the
> rest.  Fortunately for KFV, the Linux context is good enough.


Karl Goetz <address@hidden>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]