[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unicode support
From: |
Pawel Kot |
Subject: |
Re: Unicode support |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 09:07:59 +0200 (CEST) |
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Hu Gang wrote:
> good propose. It look very cool.
>
> Here is the patch.
The same note:
+ case 2: /* the value is multi byte
+ * so can check the before character */
+ if ( *(dest - 1) == '?' ) {
+ *(dest - 1) = *dest;
+ *(dest) = *(dest + 1);
+ return 1;
+ }
I think I don't get it. Why do we even touch *(dest-1)? It may be outside
our process address space. My understanding of the wctomb is that we give
it some encoded wide character. And we get the string that may be 1
character long, 2 characters long, up to MB_CUR_MAX characters long.
So we store it in the dest. And move the pointer the length - 1 bytes, as
the loop iteration will move it one byte further.
So the question: why do we even bother with '2' value? I think we don't
need to do this at all. But I just woke up, care to enlighten me what do
I miss?
pkot
--
mailto:address@hidden :: mailto:address@hidden
http://kt.linuxnews.pl/ :: Kernel Traffic po polsku
- Re: Unicode support, (continued)
- Re: Unicode support, Pawel Kot, 2002/09/26
- Re: Unicode support, Pawel Kot, 2002/09/26
- Re: Unicode support, Pawel Kot, 2002/09/26
- Re: Unicode support, Hu Gang, 2002/09/26
- Re: Unicode support,
Pawel Kot <=
- Re: Unicode support, Markus Plail, 2002/09/27
- Re: Unicode support, Hu Gang, 2002/09/27
Re: Unicode support, Pawel Kot, 2002/09/27
Re: Unicode support, Pawel Kot, 2002/09/27