Re: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/xanadux/qomunicator/

[Pavel Machek]

On Út 17-01-06 00:18:55, Pawel Kot wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 1/17/06, Pavel Machek <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I guess it would be better if proxyd talked AT natively. If you want
> > to talk to obsolete nokia phones (and you probably don't, your
> > communicator has standard AT, right?), you just connect it to
> > gnokii. [There's already gnokii part that speaks fbus/whatever to the
> > phone and AT commands to rest of the system].
> 
> There are few problems with that approach. AT commands even in the
> enhanced set offer limited functionality. Much more limited that the
> phone offers itself (using different protocols). Moreover modern
> phones (especially Nokia) offer *very* limited AT subset implemented.
> IMHO AT based proxy is no-go (well, depending on what are your needs).
> At least a dead end.

What is missing from Nokia's AT commands?

Important stuff (from my point of view, anyway) is to take a call,
send a sms, receive a call, receive an sms.

I agree that AT commands are wrong thing to do for stuff like
contact.. where some transport of VCARD/VCALENDAR would be way nicer.

                                                                Pavel

-- 
Thanks, Sharp!