Re: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/xanadux/qomunicator/

[Pavel Machek]

On Pá 20-01-06 23:31:45, Pawel Kot wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 1/20/06, Pavel Machek <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Út 17-01-06 00:18:55, Pawel Kot wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 1/17/06, Pavel Machek <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > I guess it would be better if proxyd talked AT natively. If you want
> > > > to talk to obsolete nokia phones (and you probably don't, your
> > > > communicator has standard AT, right?), you just connect it to
> > > > gnokii. [There's already gnokii part that speaks fbus/whatever to the
> > > > phone and AT commands to rest of the system].
> > >
> > > There are few problems with that approach. AT commands even in the
> > > enhanced set offer limited functionality. Much more limited that the
> > > phone offers itself (using different protocols). Moreover modern
> > > phones (especially Nokia) offer *very* limited AT subset implemented.
> > > IMHO AT based proxy is no-go (well, depending on what are your needs).
> > > At least a dead end.
> >
> > What is missing from Nokia's AT commands?
> >
> > Important stuff (from my point of view, anyway) is to take a call,
> > send a sms, receive a call, receive an sms.
> 
> And enter the security code. And that's all for Nokia phones. If
> that's fine with you, nothing's wrong. Just the competiors give much
> more functionality into the subset of supported extended AT commands.
> And it makes the library that wants to support them all much more
> complicated.

Ok, yes, I guess stuff above is enough for me, and okay for people
dealing with GSM modems (like xanadux project). Its true that full
support for calendar/contact synchronization would be "interesting"
:-(.

                                                                Pavel


-- 
Thanks, Sharp!