[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF
From: |
bill-auger |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jun 2019 18:43:37 -0400 |
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 15:16:39 -0700 Ivan wrote:
> I really don't think we should discuss any more hypothetical
> scenarios in this thread.
my response was only to indicate the reasons why it potentially
could be a topic of discussion on this list; but its not clear
why this thread is directed at the workgroup today at all
the original message stated: "I received the message from the
FSF"; but the only references given were:
Childebert <address@hidden>
Matt Samudio <address@hidden>
and then later:
"Ineiev via RT" <address@hidden>
as far as i know, none of those people work for the FSF - if you
got some message _from_the_FSF_, then that is no one else's
concern; but only for you to handle privately with the FSF
if complaints are raised to you privately by anyone else not
representing the FSF, i would ask for a proper bug report to be
opened on your bug tracker; and that person should contact this
group or the FSF only if the problem is not addressed after some
time
- [GNU-linux-libre] Fwd: reply FSF, Ivan Zaigralin, 2019/06/20
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF, bill-auger, 2019/06/20
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF, Ineiev, 2019/06/21
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF, Ivan Zaigralin, 2019/06/21
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF, Jean Louis, 2019/06/21
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF, bill-auger, 2019/06/21
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF, Ivan Zaigralin, 2019/06/21
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF, bill-auger, 2019/06/21
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF, Ivan Zaigralin, 2019/06/21
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF,
bill-auger <=
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF, Jason Self, 2019/06/21
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF, Donald Robertson, 2019/06/24
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] reply FSF, Ivan Zaigralin, 2019/06/24