[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] is the license of 'bass' acceptable?
From: |
bill-auger |
Subject: |
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] is the license of 'bass' acceptable? |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Jul 2023 21:41:36 -0400 |
On Tue, 4 Jul 2023 20:34:25 -0400 bill-auger wrote:
> if that is the path forward, let us begin
so to begin that debate, i need only to quote my previous message
> gnutoo and i believe that per its explicit wording, it is non-free
and add that, now jason concurs: its words, however confusing, make it non-free
> ruben suggested that the wording is confusing, and that GNU has previously
> established a precedent, which accepts a license with the same confusing
> requirement, and so it should be acceptable
OTOH, the rationale for accepting the OFL license makes perfect sense to me
also - the 'bass' license does appear to afford that same interpretation - i
would not hesitate to change my vote to "yay", if that is the only way to
prevent this matter from remaining resolved for years to come (and by
"resolved", i mean decided _and_ duly treated in all FSDG distros, which could
be painful if those OFL fonts are under scrutiny, or simply never done)
so again:
> how shall we resolve this?
if this were only an FSDG concern (no changes would need to made to the GNU
licenses list), we could resolve it by consensus on this list (currently: "get
rid of 'bass'" has favor) - but if the "nays" have it, then we _must_ revisit
the SIL OFL decision and probably overturn it, demoting its status on the GNU
licenses list, and opening a can of worms where we need to ask all of the
distros to remove them, however painful removing them is likely to be - we have
not a good track record of convincing distros to follow the work-group's
recommendations; so i am not enthusiastic about going down that long and arduous
path
in any case, AFAIK the status of the SIL OFL would be a decision which only RMS
can make, and that discussion, if any is necessary, probably belongs on a
different mailing list - after that is decided, the unenviable task of
convincing distros to purge those fonts from the system, would fall back upon us
so, how do we proceed? - have we hit a brick wall on this already? - are there
any more opinions or votes for "yay"?
- Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Adding some scummvm game(s) to the "List of software that does not respect the Free System Distribution Guidelines", (continued)
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Adding some scummvm game(s) to the "List of software that does not respect the Free System Distribution Guidelines", Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2023/07/04
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Adding some scummvm game(s) to the "List of software that does not respect the Free System Distribution Guidelines", Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2023/07/04
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] is the license of 'bass' acceptable?, Richard Stallman, 2023/07/07
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] is the license of 'bass' acceptable?, bill-auger, 2023/07/07
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] is the license of 'bass' acceptable?, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2023/07/16
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] is the license of 'bass' acceptable?, bill-auger, 2023/07/31
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Adding some scummvm game(s) to the "List of software that does not respect the Free System Distribution Guidelines", Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli, 2023/07/09
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Adding some scummvm game(s) to the "List of software that does not respect the Free System Distribution Guidelines", bill-auger, 2023/07/10
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Adding some scummvm game(s) to the "List of software that does not respect the Free System Distribution Guidelines", Richard Stallman, 2023/07/10
Re: [GNU-linux-libre] Adding some scummvm game(s) to the "List of software that does not respect the Free System Distribution Guidelines", John Sullivan, 2023/07/11