[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed
From: |
DFS |
Subject: |
Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:00:57 -0500 |
Rjack wrote:
> Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn.
>
> FSF runs from another opportunity to prove legal enforceability claims
> for the GPL. Just as I predicted. Listen for the Freetard spin.
>
> The Cisco v. Free Software case was dismissed with prejudice and
> without award of court costs. (On PACER court record 4/22/2009)
>
> Sincerely,
> Rjack :)
The "Free" software bozos requested "the Court order Defendant to account
for and disgorge to Plaintiff all profits derived by Defendant from its
unlawful acts;"
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/complaint-2008-12-11.pdf
LMAO! They sure do sound greedy for a not-for-profit, tax-exampt public
charity.
It should be unlawful to dump crappy open source code on the market for less
than the cost to produce it.
- Cisco v FSF dismissed, Rjack, 2009/04/22
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed,
DFS <=
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, amicus_curious, 2009/04/23
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2009/04/23
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Ciaran O'Riordan, 2009/04/24
- Message not available
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, John Hasler, 2009/04/24
- Re: Cisco v FSF dismissed, Alexander Terekhov, 2009/04/24